Tuesday, January 17, 2012

GOOD QUESTION

Well here we are again in the middle of our ongoing, seemingly never-ending, Presidential elections and being treated to debate (?) after so-called debate (?). From what I have seen these made for television sessions would not make a pimple on the behind of a real debate. For purposes of comparison, you might visit: Lincoln vs. Douglas and see what a real Presidential Debate should be like.

In our media driven world most of us are exposed to those who would be our President through these staged events where the questions seem to be couched in terms designed to create controversy between the candidates on stage rather than solicit answers which might help us choose the right person for office. Since most of the questions are written by the media or party operatives they are suspect to start with.

We are offered questions from the public either in person or through the various social media. One can only wonder about the criteria used in selecting which will actually be presented for an answer. In fact it matters little where the questions originate the answers are generally slightly related to the question. If you watched any or all of the debates have you ever heard a qustioner ask for a specific solution to one of the myriad of problems facing this country? Even if you were fortunate to get some sort of real answer to a question, it would, more than likely, be a solution proposed by one of the candidate's many "advisors" not from the candidate himself.

How then are we to decide who we should support for President? As a local TV station says "good question". In Lincoln's time, and even Truman's, candidates went out and talked to the people. They made speeches from the back of a railroad car, local park, and even a small town square. You could hear their words not something from a hired handler. Now this type of exposure is hardly possible today, unless you live in Iowa or New Hampshire, due to the shear size of our country. Incidentally, it's a good bet the number of votes cast in these critical primaries combined, are less than those cast for a Mayor of a medium sized city. Even if these candidates did take the time to go out and speak to the people the words would be vetted and controlled by those running each campaign. In no way would any candidate be allowed to utter a single sentence or phrase which could come back to haunt the campaign later on. Every answer, speech, interview, and response, is sanitized behind the scenes.

So once again you ask: How do I decide? GOOD QUESTION!