Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Why Do The Same Thing Over and Over?

Perhaps if we did a better job of teaching American history in our schools our elected representatives would pay more attention themselves. We are again enduring the same old argument about "taxing the rich". One side tells the rich must pay their fair share, while the other side talks about the job creation and investment potential of this group. It's funny though that neither result seems to be quantified in any numbers.
What is the real truth and what can be learned by examining our own history?
In their book, "A Patriot's History of the United States", Larry Schweigert and Michael Allen relate the following story: In 1921 President Warren Harding appointed Andrew Mellon as Secretary of the Treasury. Mellon's and his family made a fortune in oil and banking and he may have known more about business than any Treasury Secretary in history with the possible exception of Alexander Hamilton.
Faced with falling tax revenues Mellon undertook a study to determine the cause. The study revealed that the amount of money collected from the upper level of taxpayers, ("wealthy Americans"), declined with each tax increase. Mellon concluded that lowering the rates for everyone, especially the wealthiest taxpayers, would actually result in them paying MORE taxes!
From 1921 to 1926, Congress reduced the rates from 73% on top income earners and 4% on the lowest taxpayers to 25% and 1.5% respectively. Lo and behold the tax revenues from the "wealthiest Americans" almost tripled, while the lowest taxpayers saw their share of taxes actually fall. At the same time, the National Debt fell by one-third!
History does repeat itself. John Kennedy lowered taxes; Ronald Reagan did the same thing with similar results as those seen by Mellon in the twenties. We all know that doing or saying the same thing over and over with the same results is, at best, an exercise in futility. Yet our legislatures continue arguing over something that doesn't work and never will. I guess they think this argument will result in votes for both sides which is really their only concern, re-election.
If they were truly working in our interest they would look at reducing spending to match income. Perhaps they should engage some us "ordinary people" to conduct a seminar balancing how much we can spend with how much we make.